🔗 Share this article

The true crime genre has an innovative format, or perhaps even a completely fresh vocabulary and structure: police body cam footage. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and possible perpetrators appear suddenly to the cameras, sometimes in the harsh glare of vehicle beams or torches as the police arrive, their expressions and tones eloquent of caution or fear or indignation or dubiously feigned naivety. And we often catch sight of the faces of the officers themselves, one standing by blankly while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like extraordinary diffidence – though maybe this is because they are aware they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Documentary Filmmaking

We have already had the streaming service true-crime documentary American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the slaying of an Instagram influencer by her boyfriend, whose main point of interest was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed extraordinarily lax with the perpetrator. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, made exclusively of officer footage. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the tragic incident of a Florida mother in Ocala, Florida, a African American woman whose four young kids allegedly harassed and tormented her neighbor, a local resident. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the authorities were summoned multiple times, the accused shot Owens dead through her locked door, when Owens went to Lorincz’s house to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Police Inquiry and Legal Context

The investigating authorities found evidence that Lorincz had done internet searches into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow householders and others to use firearms if there is a significant presumption of threat. The documentary constructs its narrative with the body cam footage captured during the repeated police visits to the location before the shooting, and then at the horrific and chaotic crime scene itself – introduced by emergency call recordings of Lorincz calling the police in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also police cell footage of the individual which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Portrayal of the Accused

The film does not really suggest anything too complex about Lorincz, or any extenuating circumstance. She is obviously disturbed, although the children are heard calling her a derogatory term, an ugly jibe. The production is presented as an illustration of how self-defense regulations lead to senseless and tragic violence. But the reality of gun ownership and the constitutional right (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a late commentator famously claimed made firearm fatalities a price worth paying) is not much emphasized.

Police Interrogation and Firearm Norms

It is feasible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel astonished at how minimal concern the police took in this point. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they could have inquired in recordings that were not included). Or is possessing a firearm so commonplace it would be like asking about microwaves or bread heaters?

Detention and Consequences

For what seemed to her neighbors a very long time, the suspect was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another point of comparison, incidentally, with the a prior incident). And when she was finally officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an extraordinary sequence in which Lorincz simply declines to rise, refuses to put her wrists out for the cuffs, not aggressively, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose psychological state means that she just can’t do it. Did the gentle handling up until that point led her to think that this might actually work?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It didn’t; and the jury’s verdict is revealed in the closing credits. A deeply sobering portrayal of U.S. justice and consequences.